Effects of Electrodermal Lability and Stimulus Significance on Electrodermal Response Amplitude to Stimulus Change
- 1 November 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Psychophysiology
- Vol. 16 (6) , 520-527
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01514.x
Abstract
The effects of electrodermal lability and stimulus significance on the amplitude of the skin conductance response (SCR) component of the orienting response (OR) to stimulus change were examined. Subjects were pre‐selected in terms of the frequency of nonspecific responses (NSRs) displayed during a period of no stimulation. In Experiment 1 (N = 56), high and low NSR male subjects received 12 presentations of a 5‐sec, 1000 Hz tone followed by a test trial on which tone frequency was 500 Hz. Half of the subjects in each NSR group were required to perform a reaction time (RT) response to stimulus offset. Although high NSR groups and RT groups displayed larger test‐trial responses than low NSR and no‐RT groups respectively, stimulus change alone was sufficient to produce an increase in SCR amplitude. In Experiment 2 (N = 40), high and low NSR male subjects received 12 visually‐presented female names, and on trial 13, half the subjects in each NSR group received their own name, while the other half received a neutral male name. High NSR groups and own‐name groups displayed larger test‐trial responses than low NSR groups and neutral‐name groups respectively. However, stimulus change alone was sufficient to produce an increase in SCR amplitude in the high NSR group. The results are interpreted as indicating that stimulus change alone is sufficient to produce an increase in OR amplitude, and that the relationship between stimulus change and stimulus significance is additive rather than multiplicative.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Orienting Response as Novelty and Significance Detector: Reply to O'GormanPsychophysiology, 1979
- The Orienting Reflex: Novelty or Significance Detector?Psychophysiology, 1979
- The effect of task and stimulus variability on habituation of electrodermal and vasomotor reactionsPhysiological Psychology, 1977
- Orienting responses to a change in stimulus significanceBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976
- Delayed Habituation of the Electrodermal Orienting Response as a Function of Increased Level of ArousalPsychophysiology, 1976
- The Phasic Electrodermal Response As a Differentiated Complex Reflecting Stimulus SignificancePsychophysiology, 1975
- Electrodermal lability and the or: reply to o'gorman and further exposition of the “significance hypothesis”Australian Journal of Psychology, 1973
- Habituation and Dishabituation of Responses Innervated by the Autonomic Nervous SystemPublished by Elsevier ,1973
- Electrodermal lability and recovery of habituated orAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1972
- TO WHAT DOES THE ORIENTING RESPONSE RESPOND?Psychophysiology, 1969