Bub1 and aurora B cooperate to maintain BubR1-mediated inhibition of APC/CCdc20
Open Access
- 15 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Cell Science
- Vol. 118 (16) , 3639-3652
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02487
Abstract
The spindle checkpoint maintains genome stability by inhibiting Cdc20-mediated activation of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) until all the chromosomes correctly align on the microtubule spindle apparatus via their kinetochores. BubR1, an essential component of this checkpoint, localises to kinetochores and its kinase activity is regulated by the kinesin-related motor protein Cenp-E. BubR1 also inhibits APC/CCdc20 in vitro, thus providing a molecular link between kinetochore-microtubule interactions and the proteolytic machinery that regulates mitotic progression. Several other protein kinases, including Bub1 and members of the Ipl1/aurora family, also regulate anaphase onset. However, in human somatic cells Bub1 and aurora B kinase activity do not appear to be essential for spindle checkpoint function. Specifically, when Bub1 is inhibited by RNA interference, or aurora kinase activity is inhibited with the small molecule ZM447439, cells arrest transiently in mitosis following exposure to spindle toxins that prevent microtubule polymerisation. Here, we show that mitotic arrest of Bub1-deficient cells is dependent on aurora kinase activity, and vice versa. We suggest therefore that the checkpoint is composed of two arms, one dependent on Bub1, the other on aurora B. Analysis of BubR1 complexes suggests that both of these arms converge on the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), which includes BubR1, Bub3, Mad2 and Cdc20. Although it is known that MCC components can bind and inhibit the APC/C, we show here for the first time that the binding of the MCC to the APC/C is dependent on an active checkpoint signal. Furthermore, we show that both Bub1 and aurora kinase activity are required to promote binding of the MCC to the APC/C. These observations provide a simple explanation of why BubR1 and Mad2 are essential for checkpoint function following spindle destruction, yet Bub1 and aurora B kinase activity are not. Taken together with other observations, we suggest that these two arms respond to different spindle cues: whereas the Bub1 arm monitors kinetochore-microtubule attachment, the aurora B arm monitors biorientation. This bifurcation in the signalling mechanism may help explain why many tumour cells mount a robust checkpoint response following spindle damage, despite exhibiting chromosome instability.Keywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kinetochore Localization of Spindle Checkpoint Proteins: Who Controls Whom?Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2004
- The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosisNature, 2004
- Aurora-A and an Interacting Activator, the LIM Protein Ajuba, Are Required for Mitotic Commitment in Human CellsCell, 2003
- Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1Cell, 2003
- The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signallingNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2002
- Distinct Chromosome Segregation Roles for Spindle Checkpoint ProteinsMolecular Biology of the Cell, 2002
- Inhibition of Aurora B Kinase Blocks Chromosome Segregation, Overrides the Spindle Checkpoint, and Perturbs Microtubule Dynamics in MitosisCurrent Biology, 2002
- The Kinase Activity of Aurora B Is Required for Kinetochore-Microtubule Interactions during MitosisCurrent Biology, 2002
- Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeastCell, 1991
- S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule functionCell, 1991