Physician Refusal of Requests for Futile or Ineffective Interventions
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
- Vol. 1 (2) , 127-134
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180100000220
Abstract
Several recent articles raise an issue long unaddressed in the medical literature: physician compliance with patient or family requests for futile or ineffectice therapy. Although they agree philosophically that such treatment ought not be given, most physicians have followed the course described by Stanley Fiel, in which a young patient dying of cystic fibrosis was accepted “for evaluation” by a transplant center even though he has already passed the threshold of viability as a candidate for a heart-lung transplant. Dr. Fiel reported this action was taken not in the hope of doing the transplant but so that the family could assure themselves they had done “everything possible.” The patient, after a long and stressful cross-country flight, arrived at the hospital in respiratory failure. He died soon thereafter far from home and familiar surroundings.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heart-Lung Transplantation for Patients With Cystic FibrosisArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1991
- Family Consent to Orders Not to ResuscitateJAMA, 1990
- Medical Futility: Its Meaning and Ethical ImplicationsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Physicians' Refusal of Requested TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Book reviewBiologia plantarum, 1990
- The illusion of futility in clinical practiceThe American Journal of Medicine, 1989
- The Desperate Case: CARE (Costs, Applicability, Research, Ethics)Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1989
- Do-Not-Resuscitate OrdersJAMA, 1988
- Ethics and Communication in Do-Not-Resuscitate OrdersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Survival after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983