Phase separation and stripe formation in the two-dimensionalmodel: A comparison of numerical results
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review B
- Vol. 61 (9) , 6320-6326
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.61.6320
Abstract
We make a critical analysis of numerical results for and against phase separation and stripe formation in the model. We argue that the frustrated phase separation mechanism for stripe formation requires phase separation at too high a doping for it to be consistent with existing numerical studies of the model. We compare variational energies for various methods, and conclude that the most accurate calculations for large systems appear to be from the density-matrix renormalization group. These calculations imply that the ground state of the doped model is striped, not phase separated.
Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Energetics of Domain Walls in the 2DModelPhysical Review Letters, 1998
- Phase separation of the two-dimensionalmodelPhysical Review B, 1998
- Topological doping of correlated insulatorsSynthetic Metals, 1996
- Phase diagram of the two-dimensionalt-Jmodel at low dopingPhysical Review B, 1995
- Binding of holes and the pair spectral function in thet-JmodelPhysical Review B, 1993
- Hole dynamics in a strongly correlated two-dimensional spin backgroundPhysical Review B, 1991
- Hartree-Fock study of the magnetism in the single-band Hubbard modelPhysical Review B, 1991
- Holes and magnetic textures in the two-dimensional Hubbard modelPhysical Review B, 1991
- Superconducting phase of: A superconducting composition resulting from phase separationPhysical Review B, 1988
- Two-dimensional Hubbard model with strong electron repulsionPhysical Review B, 1988