Outpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Hong Kong
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
- Vol. 11 (2) , 92-96
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200104000-00005
Abstract
The authors performed a prospective evaluation of 60 Hong Kong Chinese patients with symptomatic gallstones and gallbladder polyps undergoing outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a regional hospital in Hong Kong from March 1996 to May 1998 to determine the feasibility, satisfaction, and acceptance of this procedure among Chinese patients. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I and II gallstones or polyps were selected. Exclusion criteria included 1) history of upper abdominal operations, attacks of acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, or pancreatitis; 2) abnormal liver function; and 3) ultrasonographic evidence of contracted gallbladder, thickened gallbladder wall, dilated common bile duct, or common bile duct stones. Patients discharged at 5:00 pm on the day of cholecystectomy were defined as having undergone outpatient procedure. Patients were asked about procedure acceptance, rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (best), using a standardized questionnaire 4 weeks after operation. The study included 21 men and 39 women with mean age of 40.5 years (range, 27–59). There were no conversions to open procedures in the series. There were 6 (10%) unanticipated postoperative hospital admissions; all patients were discharged on the first postoperative day. Another patient was readmitted 3 days after operation because of a common bile duct stone. Overall patient acceptance of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy was good, with a mean score of 8.6 of 10. Thirteen patients (22%) expressed dissatisfaction with being discharged earlier than they had expected, and 9 (15%) would have preferred inpatient care. Forty-eight patients (80%) resumed full daily activities by the first postoperative day; the remaining 12 did so by the end of the first week. Among the 44 working patients, only 4 (9%) resumed full duty within the first postoperative week; 29 (66%) did so by the second week and the remaining 11 (25%) returned to work after the third week. By selecting appropriate subjects, outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible and highly accepted among Hong Kong Chinese patients. Approximately one quarter of the patients preferred a longer postoperative stay or inpatient care.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is outpatient cholecystectomy safe for the higher-risk elective patient?Surgical Endoscopy, 1997
- Day-case (ambulatory) laparoscopic surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 1997
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as an Outpatient ProcedureJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1997
- Outpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy FeasibilityJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1996
- Outpatient CholecystectomyJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1996
- The changing pattern of surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996
- 149 ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomiesSurgical Endoscopy, 1996
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Freestanding Outpatient Surgery CenterJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1994
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Ambulatory Surgery SettingJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1992
- Variations in lengths of stay and rates of day case surgery: implications for the efficiency of surgical management.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1990