Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 March 2002
- Vol. 87 (3) , 220-228
- https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.87.3.220
Abstract
Objective: To compare the QT/RR relation in healthy subjects in order to investigate the differences in optimum heart rate correction of the QT interval. Methods: 50 healthy volunteers (25 women, mean age 33.6 (9.5) years, range 19–59 years) took part. Each subject underwent serial 12 lead electrocardiographic monitoring over 24 hours with a 10 second ECG obtained every two minutes. QT intervals and heart rates were measured automatically. In each subject, the QT/RR relation was modelled using six generic regressions, including a linear model (QT = β + α × RR), a hyperbolic model (QT = β + α/RR), and a parabolic model (QT = β × RRα). For each model, the parallelism and identity of the regression lines in separate subjects were statistically tested. Results: The patterns of the QT/RR relation were very different among subjects. Regardless of the generic form of the regression model, highly significant differences were found not only between the regression lines but also between their slopes. For instance, with the linear model, the individual slope (parameter α) of any subject differed highly significantly (p < 0.000001) from the linear slope of no fewer than 21 (median 32) other subjects. The linear regression line of 20 subjects differed significantly (p < 0.000001) from the linear regression lines of each other subject. Conversion of the QT/RR regressions to QTc heart rate correction also showed substantial intersubject differences. Optimisation of the formula QTc = QT/RRα led to individual values of α ranging from 0.234 to 0.486. Conclusion: The QT/RR relation exhibits a very substantial intersubject variability in healthy volunteers. The hypothesis underlying each prospective heart rate correction formula that a “physiological” QT/RR relation exists that can be mathematically described and applied to all people is incorrect. Any general heart rate correction formula can be used only for very approximate clinical assessment of the QTc interval over a narrow window of resting heart rates. For detailed precise studies of the QTc interval (for example, drug induced QT interval prolongation), the individual QT/RR relation has to be taken into account.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correction of the QT interval for heart rate: Review of different formulas and the use of Bazett's formula in myocardial infarctionPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Evaluation of Five QT Correction Formulas Using a Software-Assisted Method of Continuous QT Measurement from 24-Hour Holter RecordingsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Variability of the QTc interval: Impact on defining drug effect and low-frequency cardiac eventThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Measurement of the QT interval and the risk associated with QTc interval prolongation: A reviewThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Rate-corrected QT interval: Techniques and limitationsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Physiologic relation between cardiac cycle and QT duration in healthy volunteersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- An exponential formula for heart rate dependence of QT interval during exercise and cardiac pacing in humans: Reevaluation of Bazett's formulaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- The normal Q-T intervalAmerican Heart Journal, 1962
- A simple formula for clinical interpretation of the QT intervalActa Medica Scandinavica, 1949