Ten Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 91 (5) , 1402-1422
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1402
Abstract
This paper reports laboratory data for games that are played only once. These games span the standard categories: static and dynamic games with complete and incomplete information. For each game, the treasure is a treatment in which behavior conforms nicely to predictions of the Nash equilibrium or relevant refinement. In each case, however, a change in the payoff structure produces a large inconsistency between theoretical predictions and observed behavior. These contradictions are generally consistent with simple intuition based on the interaction of payoff asymmetries and noisy introspection about others' decisions. (JEL C72, C92)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Minimum-Effort Coordination Games: Stochastic Potential and Logit EquilibriumGames and Economic Behavior, 2001
- ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and CompetitionAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Experience-weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form GamesEconometrica, 1999
- Anomalous Behavior in a Traveler's Dilemma?American Economic Review, 1999
- Rent Seeking with Bounded Rationality: An Analysis of the All‐Pay AuctionJournal of Political Economy, 1998
- Bargaining and Dilemma Games: From Laboratory Data Towards Theoretical SynthesisExperimental Economics, 1998
- Signalling and Adaptive Learning in an Entry Limit Pricing GameThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1997
- Do People Rely on the Self-Interested Maximization of Others? An Experimental TestManagement Science, 1994
- Signaling Games and Stable EquilibriaThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987
- Rationalizable Strategic BehaviorEconometrica, 1984