Message-Response and “Openness” in Superior-Subordinate Communication
- 1 December 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of the International Communication Association
- Vol. 2 (1) , 293-309
- https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1978.11923731
Abstract
This study summarizes a field experiment analyzing relationships among “openness” of superior-subordinate communication, and attitudes toward five basic types of message-responses occurring in a dyad: confirmation, disagreement, accedence, repudiation and disconfirmation. Results indicated that regardless of perceived climate of “openness” of communication, subordinates (subjects) predicted (and preferred) that a superior respond to an unfavorable message from a subordinate more often with a confirming or disagreeing response, than with an acceding, or repudiating, or disconfirming response. However, dependent upon the degree of perceived “openness” or “closedness” of the communication relationship with the superior, subordinates evaluated the appropriateness of these responses differently. Moreover, the object (superior or subordinate) of the subordinate's initial message was found to play an important role in determining the superior's and subordinate's later responses. Subjects also predicted that a subordinate would respond to a superior's message with either a confirming or disagreeing response, more often than with an acceding, or repudiating, or disconfirming response.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- TOWARD A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF SELF-DISCLOSUREHuman Communication Research, 1976
- THE COMMUNICATION OF SELF-DISCLOSURE: LEVEL VERSUS VALENCE1Human Communication Research, 1975
- Measuring organizational communication.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974
- An interact system model: Generating a grounded theory of small groupsQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1971
- Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Upward Communication in Industrial HierarchiesHuman Relations, 1962
- SUPERIOR‐SUBORDINATE RELATIONSHIPS AND PERFORMANCE1Personnel Psychology, 1961
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit.Psychological Review, 1958