The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents
- 1 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 76 (3) , 408-415
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00377036
Abstract
Researchers have documented microhabitat partitioning among the heteromyid rodents of the deserts of North America that may result from microhabitat specific predation rates; large/bipedal species predominate in the open/risky microhabitat and small/quadrupedal species predominate in the bush/safer microhabitat. Here, we provide direct experimental evidence on the role of predatory risk in affecting the foraging behavior of three species of heteromyid rodents: Arizona pocket mouse (Perognathus amplus; small/quadrupedal), Bailey's pocket mouse (P. baileyi; large/quadrupedal), and Merriam's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami; large/bipedal). Both kangaroo rats and pocket mice are behaviorally flexible and able to adjust their foraging behavior to nightly changes in predatory risk. Under low levels of perceived predatory risk the kangaroo rat foraged relatively more in the open microhabitat than the two pocket mouse species. In response to the presence of barn owls, however, all three species shifted their habitat use towards the bush microhabitat. In response to direct measures of predatory risk, i.e. the actual presence of owls, all three species reduced foraging and left resource patches at higher giving up densities of seeds. In response to indirect indicators of predatory risk, i.e. illumination, there was a tendency for all three species to reduce foraging. The differences in morphology between pocket mice and kangaroo rats do appear to influence their behavioral responses to predatory risk.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predation and Competition: The Interaction of Two Types of Species InteractionsOikos, 1989
- Antipredator Behavior and the Population Dynamics of Simple Predator-Prey SystemsThe American Naturalist, 1987
- Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey SpeciesThe American Naturalist, 1984
- Body Size and Coexistnce in Desert Rodents: Chance or Community Structure?Ecology, 1982
- The energetic cost of bipedal hopping in small mammalsNature, 1980
- Ecological Implications of Resource DepressionThe American Naturalist, 1976
- Species Diversity of Seed‐Eating Desert Rodents in Sand Dune HabitatsEcology, 1973
- Population Ecology of Desert Rodent Communities: Habitats and Environmental ComplexityEcology, 1969
- Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey InteractionsThe American Naturalist, 1963
- Minimum Intensities of Illumination Under Which Owls Can Find Dead Prey by SightThe American Naturalist, 1945