Involvement of different risk factors in clinically severe large joint osteoarthritis according to the presence of hand interphalangeal nodes
Open Access
- 31 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 62 (9) , 2688-2695
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27574
Abstract
Objective To quantify the differences in risk factors influencing total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) based on the presence versus absence of multiple interphalangeal nodes in 2 or more rays of the fingers of each hand in patients with large joint osteoarthritis (OA). Methods A group of 3,800 patients with large joint OA who underwent total joint replacement (1,201 of whom had the nodal phenotype) and 1,906 control subjects from 2 case–control studies and a population‐based cohort in the UK were studied. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for the risk of total joint replacement in association with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), height, and prevalence of the T allele in the GDF5 rs143383 polymorphism. ORs for total joint replacement were compared between cases of nodal OA and cases of non‐nodal OA and between patients who underwent TKR and those who underwent THR. Results Age, sex, and BMI had significantly higher ORs for an association with total joint replacement in nodal OA cases than in non‐nodal OA cases. The GDF5 polymorphism was significantly associated with THR in cases of nodal OA, but not in cases of non‐nodal OA, and increased height was a risk factor for THR in non‐nodal OA cases only. Female sex was a protective risk factor for TKR in non‐nodal OA cases (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.52–0.70) but was predisposing for TKR in the nodal form of OA (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.49–2.26). The nodal phenotype was associated with a significantly higher risk of undergoing both THR and TKR (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.09–1.94) and also a significantly higher risk of bilateral TKR (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.37–2.11), but, paradoxically, was associated with a lower risk of bilateral THR (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56–0.91). Conclusion Nodal and non‐nodal forms of large joint OA have significantly different risk factors and outcomes, indicating a different etiology for the 2 forms of OA. With regard to the likelihood of undergoing THR, this appears to be, at least in part, genetically determined.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A genome‐wide association study identifies an osteoarthritis susceptibility locus on chromosome 7q22Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2010
- Modeling the need for hip and knee replacement surgery. Part 1. A two‐stage cross‐cohort approachArthritis Care & Research, 2009
- Large‐scale analysis of association between GDF5 and FRZB variants and osteoarthritis of the hip, knee, and handArthritis & Rheumatism, 2009
- Incidence of severe knee and hip osteoarthritis in relation to different measures of body mass: a population-based prospective cohort studyAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2009
- Variations in the pre-operative status of patients coming to primary hip replacement for osteoarthritis in European orthopaedic centresBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2009
- Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: A case–control studyArthritis & Rheumatism, 2008
- Investigations in generalized osteoarthritis. Part 2: Special histological features in generalized osteoarthritis (histological investigations in Heberden's nodes using a histological score)Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2006
- Does hand osteoarthritis predict future hip or knee osteoarthritis?Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2005
- Relationship between Heberden's nodes and underlying radiographic changes of osteoarthritisAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2005
- Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritisPublished by Elsevier ,2005