The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Vol. 29 (5) , 768-778
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70202-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in Carotid Endarterectomy Mortality in the Medicare PopulationJAMA, 1998
- Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm prevalence, treatment, and outcomeJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1997
- Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: the influence of the severity-adjustment method.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Veterans Affairs medical centersJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Vascular surgery in the United States: Workforce issuesJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Presidential address: Outcome assessment in vascular surgery — Results mean everythingJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1995
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Factors determining survival after ruptured aortic aneurysm: The hospital, the surgeon, and the patientJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1990
- Carotid endarterectomy in the elderly population: A statewide experienceJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1989