Economic Methodology in a Nutshell
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 3 (2) , 115-127
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.2.115
Abstract
This essay is a tendentious survey of standard methodological literature, focusing on the empirical appraisal of theory, microeconomic theory in particular. I shall in particular discuss four approaches to praising or damning microeconomic theory that have dominated methodological discussions. They might be called the deductivist, the positivist or Popperian, the predictionist, and the eclectic. Or to assign representative or striking figures to positions, these are John Stuart Mill's, Mark Blaug's, Milton Friedman's, and Donald McCloskey's views. I shall sketch and assess each position and defend aspects of the deductivist and eclectic views. Along the way I shall have something to say not only about how to do economics, but also about how to philosophize about economic methodology.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- New Individualistic Foundations for EconomicsNoûs, 1986
- Making a Case When Theory is UnfalsifiableEconomics and Philosophy, 1986
- The Structuralist View of Economic Theories: A Review Essay: The Case of General Equilibrium in ParticularEconomics and Philosophy, 1985
- Why Economics is not yet a SciencePublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of EconomicsPhilosophy of Science, 1981
- The Empirical Content and Longevity of Ricardian EconomicsEconomica, 1970
- Rejoinder to a Reluctant Ultra-EmpiricistSouthern Economic Journal, 1956
- The Problem of Verification in EconomicsSouthern Economic Journal, 1955
- "What is Truth" in Economics?Journal of Political Economy, 1940