The structure of action and interaction: The structural similarity of systems in social science
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
- Vol. 19 (2) , 91-127
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.1994.9990138
Abstract
The term structure is one of the most common words in the vocabulary of the social sciences. Yet, even a cursory glance at the literature reveals that a clear conception of what it means and does, is quite generally lacking. In this contribution we try and develop just such a conception, and show that, and how, it is essential to understanding the mechanics and dynamics of social systems at any level of inquiry. In particular, it will appear that both individuals and social groups of any kind or size represent nonlinear dynamical systems, something which is not without important consequences for behavioral or sociological research. Moreover, the structure of these several systems turns out to have precisely the same form. As a consequence, too, the common distinction between micro‐ and macrosociology loses much of its dogmatic or theoretical meaning.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complexity: Life at the Edge of ChaosAmerican Journal of Physics, 1993
- Power and the dynamics of behaviorQuality & Quantity, 1993
- Predicting power in exchange networks: a brief history and introduction to the issuesSocial Networks, 1992
- The arrow of timeNature, 1991
- Chaos, Making a New ScienceAmerican Journal of Physics, 1988
- Chaos and transformation: Implications of nonequilibrium theory for social science and societyBehavioral Science, 1987
- Order out of ChaosPhysics Today, 1985
- Mathematical ideas in social structural analysis*The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1984
- The behavioral function: An inquiry into the relation between behavior and utilityTheory and Decision, 1983
- The Concept of Social StructureJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1980