Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine vs. Artemether-Lumefantrine for First-Line Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in African Children: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Open Access
- 18 April 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 9 (4) , e95681
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095681
Abstract
Recent multi-centre trials showed that dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) was as efficacious and safe as artemether-lumefantrine (AL) for treatment of young children with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria across diverse transmission settings in Africa. Longitudinal follow-up of patients in these trials supported previous findings that DP had a longer post-treatment prophylactic effect than AL, reducing the risk of reinfection and conferring additional health benefits to patients, particularly in areas with moderate to high malaria transmission. We developed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of DP versus AL for first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in young children from the provider perspective, taking into consideration the post-treatment prophylactic effects of the drugs as reported by a recent multi-centre trial in Africa and using the maximum manufacturer drug prices for artemisinin-based combination therapies set by the Global Fund in 2013. We estimated the price per course of treatment threshold above which DP would cease to be a cost-saving alternative to AL as a first-line antimalarial drug. First-line treatment with DP compared to AL averted 0.03 DALYs (95% CI: 0.006–0.07) and 0.001 deaths (95% CI: 0.00–0.002) and saved $0.96 (95% CI: 0.33–2.46) per child over one year. The results of the threshold analysis showed that DP remained cost-saving over AL for any DP cost below $1.23 per course of treatment. DP is superior to AL from both the clinical and economic perspectives for treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in young children. A paediatric dispersible formulation of DP is under development and should facilitate a targeted deployment of this antimalarial drug. The use of DP as first-line antimalarial drug in paediatric malaria patients in moderate to high transmission areas of Africa merits serious consideration by health policymakers.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Temporal trends of molecular markers associated with artemether-lumefantrine tolerance/resistance in Bagamoyo district, TanzaniaMalaria Journal, 2013
- Clinical manifestations of new versus recrudescent malaria infections following anti-malarial drug treatmentMalaria Journal, 2012
- A Head-to-Head Comparison of Four Artemisinin-Based Combinations for Treating Uncomplicated Malaria in African Children: A Randomized TrialPLoS Medicine, 2011
- Safety and efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zambian childrenMalaria Journal, 2011
- Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: an open randomized, non-inferiority, trialMalaria Journal, 2010
- Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine and Artemether-Lumefantrine for Treating Uncomplicated Malaria in African Children: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority TrialPLOS ONE, 2009
- Focusing on Quality Patient Care in the New Global Subsidy for Malaria MedicinesPLoS Medicine, 2009
- Estimates of the burden of malaria morbidity in Africa in children under the age of 5 yearsTropical Medicine & International Health, 2008
- Impact of Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapy and Insecticide-Treated Nets on Malaria Burden in ZanzibarPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine versus Artesunate-Amodiaquine: Superior Efficacy and Posttreatment Prophylaxis against Multidrug-Resistant Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax MalariaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007