Multi-dimensional classification of biomedical text: Toward automated, practical provision of high-utility text to diverse users
Open Access
- 20 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 24 (18) , 2086-2093
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn381
Abstract
Motivation: Much current research in biomedical text mining is concerned with serving biologists by extracting certain information from scientific text. We note that there is no ‘average biologist’ client; different users have distinct needs. For instance, as noted in past evaluation efforts (BioCreative, TREC, KDD) database curators are often interested in sentences showing experimental evidence and methods. Conversely, lab scientists searching for known information about a protein may seek facts, typically stated with high confidence. Text-mining systems can target specific end-users and become more effective, if the system can first identify text regions rich in the type of scientific content that is of interest to the user, retrieve documents that have many such regions, and focus on fact extraction from these regions. Here, we study the ability to characterize and classify such text automatically. We have recently introduced a multi-dimensional categorization and annotation scheme, developed to be applicable to a wide variety of biomedical documents and scientific statements, while intended to support specific biomedical retrieval and extraction tasks. Results: The annotation scheme was applied to a large corpus in a controlled effort by eight independent annotators, where three individual annotators independently tagged each sentence. We then trained and tested machine learning classifiers to automatically categorize sentence fragments based on the annotation. We discuss here the issues involved in this task, and present an overview of the results. The latter strongly suggest that automatic annotation along most of the dimensions is highly feasible, and that this new framework for scientific sentence categorization is applicable in practice. Contact:shatkay@cs.queensu.caKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- New directions in biomedical text annotation: definitions, guidelines and corpus constructionBMC Bioinformatics, 2006
- An algorithm for suffix strippingProgram: electronic library and information systems, 2006
- Text-mining and information-retrieval services for molecular biologyGenome Biology, 2005
- Learning multi-label scene classificationPattern Recognition, 2004
- MedPost: a part-of-speech tagger for bioMedical textBioinformatics, 2004
- The computational analysis of scientific literature to define and recognize gene expression clustersNucleic Acids Research, 2003
- Evaluation of text data mining for database curation: lessons learned from the KDD Challenge CupBioinformatics, 2003
- Tagging gene and protein names in biomedical textBioinformatics, 2002
- Of truth and pathways: chasing bits of information through myriads of articlesBioinformatics, 2002
- An algorithm for suffix strippingProgram: electronic library and information systems, 1980