Progestogens in hormonal replacement therapy: new molecules, risks, and benefits
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Menopause
- Vol. 9 (1) , 6-15
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00042192-200201000-00003
Abstract
While the benefits of progestogen use in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are well recognized as far as endometrial protection is concerned, their risks and drawbacks have generated controversial articles. Several risks are attributed to progestogens as a class-effect; however, the progestogens used in HRT have varying pharmacological properties and do not induce the same side effects. Natural progesterone (P) and some of its derivatives, such as the 19-norprogesterones (Nestorone, nomegestrol acetate, trimegestone), do not bind to the androgen receptor and, hence, do not exert androgenic side effects. Newly synthesized molecules such as drospirenone or dienogest have no androgenic effect but do have a partial antiandrogenic effect. Drospirenone derives from spironolactone and binds to the mineralocorticoid receptor. When the cardiovascular risk factors are considered, some molecules with a higher androgenic potency than others attenuate the beneficial effects of estrogens on the lipid profile as well as the vasomotion. On the other hand, other progestogens devoid of androgenic properties do not exert these deleterious effects. The epidemiological data do not suggest any negative effect of the progestogens administered together with estrogens on cardiovascular morbidity or mortality. However, recent results suggest that in women with established coronary heart disease, HRT may not protect against further heart attacks when the progestogen selected possesses androgenic properties. The data related to the progestogen effect on breast tissue has been interpreted differently from country to country. However, it has been admitted that, according to the type of progestogen used and the dose and duration of its application, a predominant antiproliferative effect is observed in the human breast cells. As far as breast cancer risk is concerned, most epidemiological studies do not suggest any significant difference between the estrogens given alone or combined with progestogens in HRT. Complying with the classic contraindications of HRT and selecting molecules devoid of estrogenic, androgenic, or glucocorticoid effect should allow a larger use of the progestins without any major drawback.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Breast Cancer Risk: Estrogen Versus Estrogen Plus ProgestinJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Menopausal Estrogen and Estrogen-Progestin Replacement Therapy and Breast Cancer RiskJAMA, 2000
- The Protective Effects of Estrogen on the Cardiovascular SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Breast-cancer risk following long-term oestrogen- and oestrogen-progestin-replacement therapyInternational Journal of Cancer, 1999
- The Long-Term Effects of Oral and Transdermal Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy on Nitric Oxide, Endothelin-1, Prostacyclin, and ThromboxaneFertility and Sterility, 1998
- Open randomised study of use of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system as alternative to hysterectomy Commentary: Promising results but wider recruitment neededBMJ, 1998
- Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52 705 women with breast cancer and 108 411 women without breast cancerThe Lancet, 1997
- The Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Effects of Estrogen or Estrogen/ Progestin Regimens on Heart Disease Risk Factors in Postmenopausal WomenJAMA, 1995
- Carbohydrate metabolism during hormonal substitution therapyMaturitas, 1989