Self-Collection of Oral Epithelial Cell DNA under Instruction from Epidemiologic Interviewers

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Oral epithelial cells provide an easily accessible source of germline DNA. Two methods for collection were compared in a 1992–1995 case-control study of oral cancer in Puerto Rico. One group of subjects (55 controls without oral cancer) collected oral rinse samples at home or work under the direction of a nonmedically trained interviewer (“self-collection”); the other group (94 controls) participated in a clinic-based collection, which also included blood and urine samples, conducted by a medical technician (“clinic collection”). Participation was higher for self-collection (98.2%) than for clinic collection (70.7%) (p < 0.001). DNA yields ranged from 2.0 to 204.5μg (median, 25.9 μg) and did not differ by collection method, although yields varied by interviewer among self-collected samples (p = 0.02). Success rates for polymerase chain reaction amplification of the ADH3, NAT1, and multiplex CYP1A1/GSTT1/GSTM1 genotyping assays ranged from 76.4% (NAT1) to 98.2% (ADH3) for self-collected samples and were similar to those for clinic-collected samples (87.2–97.9%). Failure to amplify was associated with low DNA content (p = 0.015). Similar results were observed among cases (91 self-collected, 66 clinic collected), except that DNA yields did not vary by interviewer and a larger fraction (10.2%) of samples contained less than 5 μg of DNA, perhaps because of disease-related oral impairment. Self-collection of oral epithelial DNA samples appears satisfactory and efficient for many epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 151; 199–205.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: