Bayesian statistical inference in psychology: Comment on Trafimow (2003).
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Review
- Vol. 112 (3) , 662-668
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.112.3.662
Abstract
D. Trafimow (2003) presented an analysis of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) using Bayes's theorem. Among other points, he concluded that NHST is logically invalid, but that logically valid Bayesian analyses are often not possible. The latter conclusion reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of Bayesian inference. This view needs correction, because Bayesian methods have an important role to play in many psychological problems where standard techniques are inadequate. This comment, with the help of a simple example, explains the usefulness of Bayesian inference for psychology.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.Psychological Review, 2002
- GUEST EDITORS' INTRODUCTIONJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 2000
- Bayesian Periodic Signal Detection. I. Analysis of 20 Years of Radio Flux Measurements of the X‐Ray Binary LS I +61o303The Astrophysical Journal, 1999
- Characterization of the Bayes estimator and the MDL estimator for exponential familiesIEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1997
- Applying Occam’s razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approachPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1997
- The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal RulesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Bayes FactorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Inference for a Bernoulli Process (A Bayesian View)The American Statistician, 1976
- Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research.Psychological Review, 1963
- Inverse probability and the use of LikelihoodMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1932