Differing Incidences of Relevant Hypotension with Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 96 (6) , 1491-1495
- https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000057601.90930.18
Abstract
In this investigation we assessed whether patients receiving spinal anesthesia (SPA) as part of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) more often experience relevant hypotension than patients receiving SPA alone. From January 1, 1997, until August 5, 2000, electronic anesthesia records from 1596 patients having received SPA and 1023 patients having received CSE for elective surgery were collected by using a computerized anesthesia record-keeping system. Relevant hypotension was defined as a decrease of mean arterial blood pressure of more than 30% within a 10-min interval and a therapeutic action of the attending anesthesiologist within 20 min after onset. Electronic patient charts were reviewed by using logistic regression with a forward stepwise algorithm to identify independent risk factors that were associated with an increased incidence of hypotension after CSE. Univariate analysis was performed to assess differences in biometric data and relevant risk factors for hypotension between the two procedures. The incidence of relevant hypotension was more frequent with CSE than with SPA alone (10.9% versus 5.0%;P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, arterial hypertension (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–2.78) and sensory block height >T6 (odds ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–4.22) were found to be factors associated with hypotension in the CSE group. Compared with patients receiving SPA alone, patients undergoing CSE had a significantly more frequent prevalence of arterial hypertension and higher sensory block levels (P < 0.01) despite smaller amounts of local anesthetics. In this study, patients receiving CSE had an increased risk for relevant hypotension as compared with patients with SPA alone. Part of this effect seems to be due to the procedure alone and not only because this population is at higher risk.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Incidence and Risk Factors for Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia Induction: An Analysis with Automated Data CollectionAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2002
- Arterial Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Discrepancies Between Handwritten and Computerized Anesthesia RecordsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2000
- Clinical and practical requirements of online software for anesthesia documentation—an experience reportInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2000
- The Effects of Maternal Position During Induction of Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean DeliveryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1998
- Detection of Intraoperative Incidents by Electronic Scanning of Computerized Anesthesia RecordsAnesthesiology, 1996
- Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean sectionBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995
- Computerized patient anesthesia records: less time and better quality than manually produced anesthesia recordsJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1993
- A regression model for identifying patients at high risk of hypotension, bradycardia and nausea during spinal anesthesiaActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1992
- Incidence and Risk Factors for Side Effects of Spinal AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1992
- Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for cesarean sectionActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1988