Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
- Vol. 45 (1) , 40-62
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00010-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002
- Designing Transactions without Framing Effects in Iterative Question FormatsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002
- Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel's No-vote RecommendationThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998
- Anchoring and Adjustment in Single‐Bounded, Contingent‐Valuation QuestionsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997
- Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public GoodsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1997
- Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up QuestioningJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996
- Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound, Double-Bound, and Bivariate ModelsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1995
- Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent ValuationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991
- Interval Estimates of Non-Market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation SurveysLand Economics, 1991
- Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-Ended" Contingent Valuation SurveysThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987