Stern-Judging: A Simple, Successful Norm Which Promotes Cooperation under Indirect Reciprocity
Open Access
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Computational Biology
- Vol. 2 (12) , e178
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020178
Abstract
We study the evolution of cooperation under indirect reciprocity, believed to constitute the biological basis of morality. We employ an evolutionary game theoretical model of multilevel selection, and show that natural selection and mutation lead to the emergence of a robust and simple social norm, which we call stern-judging. Under stern-judging, helping a good individual or refusing help to a bad individual leads to a good reputation, whereas refusing help to a good individual or helping a bad one leads to a bad reputation. Similarly for tit-for-tat and win-stay-lose-shift, the simplest ubiquitous strategies in direct reciprocity, the lack of ambiguity of stern-judging, where implacable punishment is compensated by prompt forgiving, supports the idea that simplicity is often associated with evolutionary success. Humans, unlike other animal species, form large social groups in which cooperation among non-kin is widespread. This contrasts with the general assumption that the strong and selfish individuals are the ones who benefit most from natural selection. Among the different mechanisms invoked to explain the evolution of cooperation, indirect reciprocity is associated with cooperation supported by reputation: I help you and someone else helps me. However, how did reputation evolve and which type of moral is encapsulated in those social norms that are evolutionary successful? Suggesting a simple scenario for the evolution of social norms, Pacheco, Santos, and Chalub propose a reputation-based multilevel selection model, where individual behaviour and moral systems co-evolve, governed by competition and natural selection. Evolution leads to the emergence of a simple and robust social norm, which the authors call stern-judging, where implacable punishment goes side-by-side with prompt forgiving. The low level of complexity of this norm, which is supported by empirical observations in e-trade, conveys the idea that simplicity is often associated with evolutionary success.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputationPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Group selection among alternative evolutionarily stable strategiesPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- The evolution of normsPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- The leading eight: Social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocityPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- The logic of reprobation: assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocationJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2004
- Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problemNature, 2004
- The Neural Basis of Altruistic PunishmentScience, 2004
- How should we define goodness?—reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocityPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- The Biology of Moral SystemsUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 1989
- The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare.The Economic Journal, 1987