A comparison of three stereotactic radiotherapy techniques; ARCS vs. noncoplanar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Vol. 42 (2) , 431-436
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00206-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely-planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1996
- A comparison of intensity modulated conformal therapy with a conventional external beam stereotactic radiosurgery system for the treatment of single and multiple intracranial lesionsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1996
- Conformal radiation therapy with fixed shaped coplanar or noncoplanar radiation beam bouquets: A possible alternative to radiosurgeryInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimatorsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- Static field conformal stereotactic radiosurgery: Physical techniquesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- Radiation therapy oncology group: Radiosurgery quality assurance guidelinesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1993
- Dynamic field shaping for stereotactic radiosurgery: A modeling studyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1993
- Dynamic field shaping to optimize stereotactic radiosurgeryInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991
- Relocatable frame for stereotactic external beam radiotherapyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1991
- A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear acceleratorInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1988