Comparative morphology of primary and secondary deposits of prostatic adenocarcinoma
- 15 July 1981
- Vol. 48 (2) , 271-273
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19810715)48:2<271::aid-cncr2820480210>3.0.co;2-6
Abstract
In 42 patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate, histopathologic specimens of the original prostatic biopsy and lymphatic metastasis were classified using the grading system of tumor differentiation described by Gleason et al.6 The observed similarity between prostatic biopsy morphology and the morphology in the corresponding lymphatic metastasis supports the concept that the histologic growth pattern of the primary tumor is reduplicated in the metastatic lesions. The observation that a more anaplastic pattern did not appear in the metastatic deposits implies that factors other than cellular loss of differentiation are responsible for the cells' ability to metastasize.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experience with Gleason’s Histopathologic Grading in Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1980
- Differences in Pathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Clinical A2 Prostatic Cancer from A1 and B DiseaseJournal of Urology, 1978
- well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostateCancer, 1978
- Carcinoma of the Prostate: A RevivewJournal of Urology, 1978
- Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Relationship of Grade and Local Extent to the Pattern of MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1977
- An Aggressive Approach to Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1977
- Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical StagingJournal of Urology, 1974
- Carcinoma of the Prostate and Lymphatic MetastasesJournal of Urology, 1974
- The Histology and Prognosis of Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1967
- Unsuspected carcinoma of the prostate in suprapubic prostatectomy specimens.A clinicopathological study of 55 consecutive casesCancer, 1960