What did ‘the people’ want?: the meaning of the 1945 general election
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Historical Journal
- Vol. 35 (3) , 623-639
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00026005
Abstract
Labour's victory at the general election of 1945, the first in which the party won an absolute majority in the house of commons, had fundamental implications for Britain's post-war history. Despite this, historians have failed to examine the popular political temper which made Labour's term of office possible. Instead, they have largely assumed that the Second World War radicalized the public, turning an unprecedented number into enthusiastic Labour voters. Whilst not denying that the war had a profound impact on the politics of some sections of society this article proposes a rather different perspective to that normally offered. Instead of promoting pro-Labour sentiment it seems that the conflict left many members of the public disengaged from the political process and cynical about the motives of all politicians. As a consequence, rather than have Labour hold office by itself the generally favoured outcome appears to have been the formation of a progressive coalition committed to the implementation of the Beveridge report. However, in reality, electors who did not want to see the return of a Conservative government had no choice but to vote ‘straight left’.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Labour in Scotland during the Second World WarThe Historical Journal, 1983
- Coventry Communism: A Study of Factory Politics in the Second World WarHistory Workshop Journal, 1980
- The 1945 General Election ReconsideredThe Historical Journal, 1980
- THE MEANING OF THE BRITISH ELECTIONPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1945
- THE BRITISH SOLDIER: CHANGING ATTITUDES AND IDEASThe British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 1945
- THE POLITICAL TEMPERThe Political Quarterly, 1945