Geological divisions of time
- 1 December 1966
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics
- Vol. 9 (4) , 399-407
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1966.10422484
Abstract
The span of conceivable past time increased explosively when artificial mental restraints were removed less than 200 years ago. Unfortunately, doctrines and practices of stratigraphy were already established before emancipation. Perhaps for this reason, time has tended to take an inferior place in philosophical discussions of the time-rock relationship, and weaknesses and fallacies have been less easily perceived. Though the formation of any sequence of strata obviously occupied some finite span of time, it does not follow in reverse that the total span of continuous past time can properly be classified or subdivided into arbitrary intervals defined by selected separate rock sequences. The validity of the type section and the usefulness of the time-stratigraphic unit are therefore held in doubt. On the other hand, the concepts of “biochron” and “zone” as used in one sense offer a sound basis for geological age-measurement and a means for referring geological age to radiometrically determined points on the continuous secular time scale. It is predicted that the traditional geological time divisions will be retained in use along with the secular time scale, but will eventually be redefined in terms of the latter.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Homotaxial stratigraphyNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1965
- The type locality concept in time-stratigraphyNew Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 1960
- Stratigraphic terminologyGSA Bulletin, 1941
- The Discrimination of Time-Values in GeologyThe Journal of Geology, 1901
- Dual Nomenclature in Geological ClassificationThe Journal of Geology, 1894