Toward a “Risk Index” to Assess Work Schedules
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Chronobiology International
- Vol. 21 (6) , 1063-1072
- https://doi.org/10.1081/cbi-200036919
Abstract
This article describes our preliminary attempt to develop a Risk Index to estimate the risk of human error on different work schedules based on trends in the relative risk of accidents and injuries, rather than on hypothetical intervening variables such as alertness, fatigue, or performance on interpolated tasks. We briefly review trends in risk from the published epidemiological studies that have ensured that the a priori risk was constant. A simple Risk Index based on an additive model is developed on the basis of these trends, and we illustrate how it may be used to assess work schedules. Finally, we compare the results from this Risk Index with those from the UK HSE's Fatigue Index and point out the discrepancies that emerge. We conclude that our risk-based modeling approach may assist in developing safer work schedules and also increase our understanding of this complex, multifaceted area.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in Sleepiness during Early Morning Shifts: A Mixed Model Approach to an Experimental Field Study of Train DriversChronobiology International, 2004
- Lessons About Sleepiness and Driving from the Selby Rail Disaster Case:R v Gary Neil HartChronobiology International, 2004
- Shift work, safety and productivityOccupational Medicine, 2003
- Rest breaks and accident riskThe Lancet, 2003
- Impact of added rest breaks on the productivity and well being of workersErgonomics, 2001
- Internal and External Factors Influencing Time-Related Injury Risk in Continuous Shift WorkInternational Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2000
- Black times: Temporal determinants of transport safetyAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1997
- Performance, alertness, and sleep after 3·5 years of 12 h shifts: A follow-up studyWork & Stress, 1991