Body size and species–richness in carnivores and primates
- 22 January 1998
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 265 (1391) , 113-119
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0271
Abstract
We use complete species–level phylogenies of extant Carnivora and Primates to perform the first thorough phylogenetic tests, in mammals, of the hypothesis that small body size is associated with species–richness. Our overall results, based on comparisons between sister clades, indicate a weak tendency for lineages with smaller bodies to contain more species. The tendency is much stronger within caniform carnivores (canids, procyonids, pinnipeds, ursids and mustelids), perhaps relating to the dietary flexibility and hence lower extinction rates in small, meat–eating species. We find significant heterogeneity in the size—diversity relationship within and among carnivore families. There is no significant association between body mass and species–richness in primates or feliform carnivores. Although body size is implicated as a correlate of species–richness in mammals, much of the variation in diversity cannot be attributed to size differences.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Body-size evolution in Cretaceous molluscs and the status of Cope's ruleNature, 1997
- Phylogenetic uncertainties and sensitivity analyses in comparative biologyPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1996
- Macroevolutionary inferences from primate phylogenyProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1995
- Cope's rule, the island rule and the scaling of mammalian population densityNature, 1993
- A method for the analysis of comparative dataJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1992
- Generic species richness and body mass in North American mammals: Support for the inverse relationship of body size and speciation rateHistorical Biology, 1992
- Comparative methods for explaining adaptationsNature, 1991
- Life History Correlates of Taxonomic DiversityEcology, 1991
- Are the Smallest Organisms the Most Diverse?Ecology, 1988
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985