Reliability of the assessment of impairments and disabilities in survey research in the field of physical therapy
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Disability Studies
- Vol. 12 (2) , 61-65
- https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799009166252
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the reliability of diagnostic assessment based on clinical observations by physical therapists. Design: interobserver studies between two pairs of physical therapists. Setting: two primary-care physical therapy practices. Patients: all applying to the practices for treatment. Exclusions: physical therapy in previous 3 months, or need for acute treatment. Assessments: schedule derived from the 1CIDH. Results: agreement on disabilities better than on impairments, the latter revealing problems particularly with pain and restricted range of motion. Conclusions: reliability of assessments of most of the categories considered was reliable; in two categories the reliability was poor, and the categories were modified.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The short-form McGill pain questionnairePain, 1987
- Issues in the Use of Kappa to Estimate ReliabilityMedical Care, 1986
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960