Hostilité, Conformité, Fraternité: The Group Dynamics of Terrorist Behavior
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
- Vol. 36 (2) , 211-224
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.1986.11491449
Abstract
There are two major categories of terrorist groups: the “anarchic-ideologues,” such as the Red Army Faction, committed to destroying the world of their fathers; and the “nationalist-separatists,” such as ETA of the Basques, who carry on the mission of their fathers. Despite the diversity of terrorist groups and causes, a comparative study indicates a remarkable uniformity of terrorist behavior. The groups draw their membership from marginal, isolated, and inadequate individuals from troubled families, so that for many, belonging to the terrorist group is the first time they have truly belonged to any group. Organized against society, the group is seen as all good and the outside society as all bad. This polarization is central to the group's ideology and is the rationale for committing violent, antiestablishment acts.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experiences in GroupsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Notes on a psychodynamic theory of terrorist behaviorTerrorism, 1984
- Patterns in the lives of ETA membersTerrorism, 1983
- GruppenprozessePublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- A computerized diagnostic evaluation of a psychiatric problemAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1980
- Internal organizational problems and the sources of tensions of terrorist movements as catalysts of violence?Terrorism, 1978