Usefulness of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: A systematic review
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 117 (9) , 676-684
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.04.021
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-Dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management studyThe American Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Validation of the Canadian Clinical Probability Model for Acute Venous ThrombosisAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2002
- THE EVALUATION OF DIAGNOSTIC TESTS: Principles, Problems, and New DevelopmentsAnnual Review of Medicine, 1996
- Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerationsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studiesPublished by Elsevier ,1991
- Some Practical Issues of Experimental Design and Data Analysis in Radiological ROC StudiesInvestigative Radiology, 1989
- Clinical Prediction RulesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Factors associated with correct antemortem diagnosis of major pulmonary embolismThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Problems of Acute Deep Venous ThrombosisAngiology, 1969