Conscious vs Unconscious Processes
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theory & Psychology
- Vol. 2 (1) , 73-88
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354392021004
Abstract
Several lines of empirical research show a contrast between conscious and unconscious functions in humans. Dyslexics show eye movement patterns that concentrate on correct solutions to language problems, even if the patients fail to solve the problems, showing a decoupling of observable behavior from conscious awareness and integrating ability. Vision is represented by many topographic maps in the brain, and these maps can be separated into two streams of visual processing. Only one is available to consciousness; the other controls visually guided behavior. In the laboratory, different spatial values can be stored simultaneously in cognitive and sensorimotor visual systems respectively, and seemingly contradictory spatial behavior can originate from each. Taken together, the empirical studies show important unconscious aspects of mental activity, and a very restricted role for consciousness.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The language bioprogram hypothesisBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1984
- On the origin of stroboscopic induced motionPerception & Psychophysics, 1983
- Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motionPerception & Psychophysics, 1981
- Omnidirectional increase in threshold for image shifts during saccadic eye movementsPerception & Psychophysics, 1979
- Saccadic eye movements towards stimuli triggered by prior saccadesVision Research, 1976
- Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movementsVision Research, 1975
- Information about spatial location based on knowledge about efference.Psychological Review, 1965
- Eye-movements in Relation to Retinal ActionOptica Acta: International Journal of Optics, 1955
- Über induzierte BewegungPsychological Research, 1929
- Visual perception during eye movement.Psychological Review, 1900