Tourism and Post-Disciplinary Enquiry
- 15 July 2006
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Current Issues in Tourism
- Vol. 9 (4-5) , 293-319
- https://doi.org/10.2167/cit327.0
Abstract
In recent times there has been discussion about whether studies of tourism are variously a disciplinary, multi-disciplinary or inter-disciplinary pursuit and how these relate to the institutional landscapes and practices of higher education. For some academics, these discourses are somewhat arid, but we would contend they are vital as they serve to set the epistemological terms of references for tourism scholars and play a not insignificant role in orchestrating knowledge production about tourism. This paper revisits some of these concerns relating to disciplinarity, and it suggests that disciplines as we understand them today are an artefact of previous academic divisions of labour which still dominate current institutional regulatory regimes. The purpose of the paper is to suggest that tourism studies would benefit greatly from a post-disciplinary outlook, i.e. a direction ‘beyond disciplines’ which is more problem-focused, based on more flexible modes of knowledge production, plurality, synthesis and s...Keywords
This publication has 103 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconsidering the Geography of Tourism and Contemporary MobilityGeographical Research, 2005
- Thinking across the divide: perspectives on the conversations between physical and human geographyArea, 2004
- Integrating Social Science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network: Social Dimensions of Ecological Change and Ecological Dimensions of Social ChangeEcosystems, 2004
- Whither Geography?The Professional Geographer, 2003
- The future in the social sciencesFutures, 2003
- Pre-disciplinary and Post-disciplinary PerspectivesNew Political Economy, 2001
- Movers and shakers: chaos makers in tourism developmentTourism Management, 1999
- A chaos approach to tourismTourism Management, 1999
- Introduction: Towards a new (international) political economy?New Political Economy, 1999
- Editorial: New political economyNew Political Economy, 1996