Can Bourdieu’s Critical Theory Liberate us from the Symbolic Violence?
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies
- Vol. 4 (3) , 362-376
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708603254896
Abstract
Pierre Bourdieu argued that sociologists must go beyond the description of how social agents’ self-understanding of their institution and society is displayed in their interaction, and should offer a critique of current practice so that the social agents can liberate themselves from the grip of the legitimated symbolic domination. In this article, the author hopes to show that Bourdieu’s attempt to establish the epistemologically privileged status of his critique fails on two counts. First, Bourdieu’s reliance on psychoanalysis to prove the epistemologically privileged status of his analysis does not provide us with independent evidence that shows why the lay social agents must ascribe an epistemic authority to him. Second, Bourdieu’s notion of illusio deprives him of the epistemic authority required for the liberation of social agents from the symbolic violence.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social theory as practicePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2012
- The Poverty of PostmodernismPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2002
- The reflexive interview and a performative social scienceQualitative Research, 2001
- The Management of Temporality: Ethnomethodology as Historical Reconstruction of Practical ActionThe Sociological Quarterly, 1999
- The social actor: social action in real timePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1991
- The peculiar history of scientific reasonSociological Forum, 1991
- The Scholastic Point of ViewCultural Anthropology, 1990
- In Other WordsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1990
- Action and Narration in PsychoanalysisNew Literary History, 1980
- The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reasonSocial Science Information, 1975