Use of Alternative Thresholds Defining Insulin Resistance to Predict Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease
- 26 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 117 (8) , 1003-1009
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.727727
Abstract
Background— The performance characteristics of surrogate insulin resistance (IR) measures, commonly defined as the top 25% of the measure’s distribution, used to predict incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) have not been critically assessed in community samples. Methods and Results— Baseline IR was assessed among 2720 Framingham Offspring Study subjects by use of fasting insulin, the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR), and the reciprocal of the Gutt insulin sensitivity index, with 7- to 11-year follow-up for incident DM (130 cases) or CVD (235). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio were estimated at 12 diagnostic thresholds (quantiles) of IR measures. Positive likelihood ratios for DM or CVD increased in relation to IR quantiles; risk gradients were greater for DM than for CVD, with no 9th to 10th quantile (76th centile) threshold effects. IR had better discrimination for incident DM than for CVD (HOMA-IR area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: DM 0.80 versus CVD 0.63). The HOMA-IR ≥76th centile threshold was associated with these test-performance values: sensitivity (DM 68%, CVD 40%), specificity (DM 77%, CVD 76%), and positive likelihood ratio (DM 3.0, CVD 1.7). The HOMA-IR threshold that yielded >90% sensitivity was the 6th quantile for DM prediction and the 3rd quantile for CVD. Compared with the ≥76th centile threshold, these alternative thresholds yielded lower specificity (DM 43%, CVD 17%) and positive likelihood ratios (DM 1.6, CVD 1.1). Conclusions— Surrogate IR measures have modest performance at the 76th centile, with no threshold effects. Different centile thresholds might be selected to optimize sensitivity versus specificity for DM versus CVD prediction if surrogate IR measures are used for risk prediction.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of Incident Diabetes Mellitus in Middle-aged AdultsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2007
- Impact of Insulin Resistance on Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in People With Metabolic SyndromeDiabetes Care, 2007
- Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Alternative Definitions of the Metabolic SyndromeCirculation, 2005
- Insulin Resistance, the Metabolic Syndrome, and Incident Cardiovascular Events in the Framingham Offspring StudyDiabetes, 2005
- Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratiosBMJ, 2004
- Hyperinsulinemia, Hyperglycemia, and Impaired HemostasisJAMA, 2000
- Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity: studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity.Diabetes Care, 2000
- Comment on the provisional report from the WHO consultationDiabetic Medicine, 1999
- Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Using Risk Factor CategoriesCirculation, 1998
- Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and ?-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in manDiabetologia, 1985