Morphological variation in small theropods and its meaning in systematics: evidence from Syntarsus rhodesiensis
- 30 November 1990
- book chapter
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract
Because they are small and their bones fragile, small theropods are usually found as poorly preserved fossils. It is, therefore, often difficult to identify morphological features that clearly and unequivocally characterize individual small theropod taxa, to distinguish them from each other. This legacy of fragility has unquestionably handicapped studies of small theropod systematics in the past. Several authors have recently published cladistic analyses of archosaur lineages, including the theropods, but the picture remains somewhat murky as their cladograms are not easily reconciled with each other. Perhaps this is also partly attributable to study material that is incomplete and poorly preserved. The Early Jurassic (terminal Karoo) Syntarsus rhodesiensis is a small theropod taxon based on material that is both quantitatively adequate and qualitatively excellent as far as preservation is concerned. Partial remains of more than 30 individuals have been recovered from one of three known localities in the fine-grained aeolian Forest Sandstone Formation of Zimbabwe, southern Africa. The fossiliferous bed in this unusually rich locality suggests that a single event caused the catastrophic mass death of a socially gregarious group. Syntarsus shows clear and consistent morphological variation that is bimodally distributed in the sample examined. The variation affects particularly the trochanters and muscle scars of the femur, but it has also been observed in other elements of the skeleton. I conclude that the morphological variation shown by the known Syntarsus sample reflects clear sexual dimorphism, and not taxonomic diversity.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: