A comparison of staging systems for localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma
Open Access
- 15 June 2000
- Vol. 88 (12) , 2721-2730
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12<2721::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-d
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staging systems for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are important to identify patients with similar systemic risk who might benefit from specific treatments. This study compared four commonly used staging systems for predicting systemic outcomes of patients with localized extremity STS, as proposed by the fourth and fifth editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) staging system, the Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) system, and the Surgical Staging System (SSS) of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society. METHODS Three hundred consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic STS of the lower extremity were treated at Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center between 1982 and 1989. Metastasis free survival was the end point of the study. The prognostic value of the four staging systems and their components were examined in univariate and multivariate analyses. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to identify the system that best predicted the risk of systemic recurrence. RESULTS Compartment status, depth, grade, and size were all independent predictors of outcome within their respective staging systems. However, when compared with one another, only depth, grade, and size retained their prognostic significance. Of the four models, the AIC predicted that the MSK was the best predictor of systemic relapse, followed by the fifth edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system. CONCLUSIONS Staging systems such as the MSK system or the fifth edition of the AJCC/UICC system, which include tumor depth, grade, and size as prognostic factors, are the most predictive of systemic relapse in patients presenting with localized extremity STS. Both of these systems identify the same group of patients at the highest risk who would be the most suitable for adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Cancer 2000;88:2721–30. © 2000 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Soft Tissue Ewing's Sarcoma and Peripheral Neuroectodermal TumorClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996
- Primary Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma--Experience With ChemotherapyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995
- Better grading systems for evaluating the degree of lymph node invasion in cancer of the thoracic esophagusSurgery Today, 1994
- Prognostic Factors Predictive of Survival and Local Recurrence for Extremity Soft Tissue SarcomaAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- Histopathological prediction of liver metastasis after curative resection of colorectal cancerSurgical Oncology, 1992
- Segregation Analysis of Esophageal Cancer in 221 High-Risk Chinese FamiliesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1992
- The reappraisal of prognostic classifictions for colorectal cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1989
- A System for the Surgical Staging of Musculoskeletal SarcomaClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1980
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958