Marker Selection by Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Genetic Epidemiology
- Vol. 21 (S1) , S272-S277
- https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.2001.21.s1.s272
Abstract
We carried out a discriminant analysis with identity by descent (IBD) at each marker as inputs, and the sib pair type (affected-affected versus affected-unaffected) as the output. Using simple logistic regression for this discriminant analysis, we illustrate the importance of comparing models with different number of parameters. Such model comparisons are best carried out using either the Akaike information criterion (AIC) or the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). When AIC (or BIC) stepwise variable selection was applied to the German Asthma data set, a group of markers were selected which provide the best fit to the data (assuming an additive effect). Interestingly, these 25–26 markers were not identical to those with the highest (in magnitude) single-locus lod scores.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- New Stopping Criteria for Segmenting DNA SequencesPhysical Review Letters, 2001
- A Genome-wide Search for Linkage to Asthma22See the Appendix.Genomics, 1999
- Design of artificial neural network and its applications to the analysis of alcoholism dataGenetic Epidemiology, 1999
- Covariates in linkage analysisGenetic Epidemiology, 1999
- Model Selection and InferencePublished by Springer Nature ,1998
- Estimating the Dimension of a ModelThe Annals of Statistics, 1978
- A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1974