Shape from Shading in Different Frames of Reference
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 19 (4) , 523-530
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p190523
Abstract
It has often been reported that, in the absence of information about the direction of illumination, people interpret surface convexities and concavities in accordance with the assumption that illumination comes from above. However, ‘above’ could mean with reference to gravity, the head or the retina. Yonas et al reported that four-year-old infants use the head more than gravity as the frame of reference in interpreting surface relief but that seven-year-olds make about equal use of the two frames of reference. The potency of these two frames of reference when acting separately and when pitted against each other was measured on adult subjects. For all subjects the ‘assumption’ about the direction of illumination was predominantly with respect to the head. The gravitational frame was used only when the headcentric frame was irrevelant, and then not consistently.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Binocular Depth Reversals Despite Familiarity CuesScience, 1989
- Infants’ sensitivity to the depth cue of shadingPerception & Psychophysics, 1985
- What Does the Occluding Contour Tell Us about Solid Shape?Perception, 1984
- Information about Three-Dimensional Shape and Direction of Illumination in a Square-Wave GratingPerception, 1984
- Light Source Position in the Perception of Object ShapePerception, 1983
- Occluding Edges in Apparent Reversal of Convexity and ConcavityPerception, 1983
- The Shape of Smooth Objects and the Way Contours EndPerception, 1982
- Random-Dot Stereograms of Real Objects: Observations on Stereo Faces and MouldsPerception, 1979
- Attached-shadow orientation perceived as depth by chickens reared in an environment illuminated from below.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970
- Ueber ein Anaglyptoskop (Vorrichtung, vertiefte Formen erhaben zu sehen)Annalen der Physik, 1856