Using Cluster Randomized Field Experiments to Study Voting Behavior
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
- Vol. 601 (1) , 169-179
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205277804
Abstract
Voter mobilization experiments are often conducted using individual-level randomization, which can be difficult to implement. A simpler approach is to randomly assign voting precincts, rather than individuals nested within them, to treatment and control groups. Not only is it easier and potentially less expensive to implement, it may allow researchers to study vote preference effects without collecting survey data. This article explores various methodological concerns that researchers should consider when designing and analyzing precinct-level experiments. These concerns are illustrated using data from a precinct-level randomized field experiment conducted in Kansas City, Missouri.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical and Substantive Inferences in Public Health: Issues in the Application of Multilevel ModelsAnnual Review of Public Health, 2004
- Designing multi-level studies:Electoral Studies, 2002
- The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field ExperimentAmerican Political Science Review, 2000
- Using Cluster Random Assignment to Measure Program ImpactsEvaluation Review, 1999
- Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials.Psychological Methods, 1997
- Stimulating Voter Turnout in a PrimaryInternational Political Science Review, 1981
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- SYMPOSIUM ON CHD PREVENTION TRIALS: DESIGN ISSUES IN TESTING LIFE STYLE INTERVENTIONAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1978
- Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting BehaviorAmerican Political Science Review, 1956