The Readability of Segmented and Conventional Numerals
- 1 October 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 12 (5) , 493-497
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872087001200510
Abstract
The objective of this research was to compare the readability of slanted and vertically segmented numerals with the readability of the numeral design recommended in most human engineering guides. The specific variable investigated was the accuracy with which the numbers could be read at three exposure times. Results indicated that the readability of the slanted segmented numerals was no better than that of the vertical segmented numerals. Both forms of segmented displays were significantly inferior to the conventional numerals in readability. It was concluded that segmented displays, as presently designed, should not be used where accuracy is critical and exposure time is severely limited.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Legibility of segmented versus standard numerals: The influence of the observer's task.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1968
- LEGIBILITY OF SEGMENTED VERSUS STANDARD NUMERALS: A REVIEW.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1967
- Variability of stroke within digits.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1961
- An information analysis of verbal and motor responses to symbolic and conventional Arabic numerals.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1958
- Evaluation of angular digits and comparisons with a conventional set.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1956
- Rate of information transfer with seven symbolic visual codes: motor and verbal responses.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1956
- Effects of form on the legibility of numbers.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1954
- An experiment on the coding of numerals for tape presentation.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1953