Discrepant Analysis
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 52 (12) , 1231-1237
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00101-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Biomedical Application of Latent Class Models with Random EffectsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1998
- A Model for Evaluating Sensitivity and Specificity for Correlated Diagnostic Tests in Efficacy Studies with an Imperfect Reference TestJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1998
- Letter to the editor: Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detectingChlamydia trachomatis by A. Hadgu,Statistics in Medicine,16, 1391-1399 (1997)Statistics in Medicine, 1998
- Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detectingChlamydia trachomatis by A. Hadgu,Statistics in Medicine,16, 1391-1399 (1997)Statistics in Medicine, 1998
- Bias in Discrepant Analysis: When Two Wrongs Don’t Make a RightJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Discrepant analysis—or behaviour?The Lancet, 1997
- BIAS IN THE EVALUATION OF DNA-AMPLIFICATION TESTS FOR DETECTINGCHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATISStatistics in Medicine, 1997
- The discrepancy in discrepant analysisThe Lancet, 1996
- Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urineThe Lancet, 1995
- Methodology for the assessment of new dichotomous diagnostic testsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981