Misselling through Agents
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 99 (3) , 883-908
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.883
Abstract
This paper analyzes the implications of the inherent conflict between two tasks performed by direct marketing agents: prospecting for customers and advising on the product's "suitability" for the specific needs of customers. When structuring salesforce compensation, firms trade off the expected losses from "misselling" unsuitable products with the agency costs of providing marketing incentives. We characterize how the equilibrium amount of misselling (and thus the scope of policy intervention) depends on features of the agency problem including: the internal organization of a firm's sales process, the transparency of its commission structure, and the steepness of its agents' sales incentives. (JEL M31, M37, M52)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strategic judgment proofingThe RAND Journal of Economics, 2008
- Optimal DelegationThe Review of Economic Studies, 2008
- Conflicts of interest, information provision, and competition in the financial services industryPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Self-Regulation and Government OversightThe Review of Economic Studies, 2005
- Organizational Design: Decision Rights and Incentive ContractsAmerican Economic Review, 2001
- Personal Pensions Misselling: The Causes and Lessons of Regulatory FailureThe Modern Law Review, 1998
- Delegated ExpertiseJournal of Accounting Research, 1987
- Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic PerspectiveMarketing Science, 1985
- Strategic Information TransmissionEconometrica, 1982
- Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of FraudThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1973