Long‐term follow‐up of a prospective, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled randomized trial of clodronate in multiple myeloma
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Haematology
- Vol. 113 (4) , 1035-1043
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02851.x
Abstract
Oral clodronate (1600 mg/d) has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of skeletal complications in multiple myeloma. Preliminary analysis of a double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial of this treatment indicated that clodronate might prolong survival in patients without vertebral fractures at presentation. This issue was re‐examined after further follow‐up of the patients recruited into the Medical Research Council (MRC) VIth Myeloma Study. The trial examined the effects of clodronate on the natural history of skeletal disease in multiple myeloma; 619 patients were randomized between June 1986 and May 1992 commencing 15 d after the start of ABCM [adriamycin, BCNU (carmustine), cyclophosphamide, melphalan] chemotherapy or 43 d after ABCMP (ABCM + prenisolone); 535 patients who received clodronate or placebo were included in the analysis. The presence or absence of spinal fractures was assessed centrally from spinal X‐rays; long‐bone fractures were assessed locally. With a median follow‐up of 8·6 years, there was no overall significant difference in survival between the two treatment groups (O/E, χ2 = 0·78,P = 0·38). Among the subgroup of 153 patients with no skeletal fractures at presentation there was a significant survival advantage (O/E, χ2 = 7·52,P = 0·006) in favour of the 73 patients receiving clodronate, with median survivals being, respectively, 59 months (95% CI 43–71 months) and 37 months (95% CI 31–52 months), and 5‐year survivals being 46% and 35%. The original analysis of this study shows that there is a benefit in taking 1600 mg clodronate daily for patients with myelomatosis to prevent the development of new skeletal disease. Bearing in mind the limitations of subgroup analysis, the present study indicates that treatment may prolong survival in patients without overt skeletal disease at diagnosis. These observations, however, require confirmation in prospective clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heterocycle-Containing Bisphosphonates Cause Apoptosis and Inhibit Bone Resorption by Preventing Protein Prenylation: Evidence from Structure-Activity Relationships in J774 MacrophagesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- A randomized trial of the effect of clodronate on skeletal morbidity in multiple myelomaBritish Journal of Haematology, 1998
- Clodronate and Liposome-Encapsulated Clodronate Are Metabolized to a Toxic ATP Analog, Adenosine 5′-(β,γ-Dichloromethylene) Triphosphate, by Mammalian Cells In VitroJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Efficacy of Pamidronate in Reducing Skeletal Complications in Patients with Breast Cancer and Lytic Bone MetastasesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Clodronate decreases the frequency of skeletal metastases in women with breast cancerBone, 1996
- Efficacy of Pamidronate in Reducing Skeletal Events in Patients with Advanced Multiple MyelomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Bisphosphonates act on rat bone resorption through the mediation of osteoblasts.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1993
- Screening blood donations for HCVThe Lancet, 1992
- LONG-TERM CONTROLLED TRIAL WITH DIPHOSPHONATE IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOLYTIC BONE METASTASESThe Lancet, 1983
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958