Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Common Hospital Hand Disinfectants Against Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureus,Glycopeptide-Intermediate S.aureus,and Heterogeneous Glycopeptide-IntermediateS. aureus
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 30 (3) , 226-232
- https://doi.org/10.1086/595691
Abstract
Background.: The presence of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and glycopeptide-intermediateS. aureus(GISA) in hospitals poses a significant challenge to hospital infection control teams. The use of disinfectants for both surface and hand cleaning is an essential part of the infection control measures.Objective.: To evaluate the effectiveness of common hospital hand disinfectants against MRSA, GISA, and heterogeneous GISA (hGISA).Methods.: For methicillin-susceptible S.aureus(MSSA), MRSA, GISA, and hGISA, the levels of susceptibility to hand disinfectants and their active ingredients were determined. Suspension tests were performed on commercial handwashing products.Results.: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 2-propanol, Chlorhexidine, and hexachlorophene were similar for all phenotypes. The MICs of cetrimide and triclosan were higher for the MRSA, GISA, and hGISA strains than for the MSSA strain. The MICs for the chlorhexidine-containing agents Hibisol and Hibiscrub (AstraZeneca) and for the propanol-containing agent Sterillium (Medline) were 1-2-fold lower for the MSSA strains than for the MRSA, GISA, and hGISA strains. Suspension tests showed that the GISA and hGISA strains were less susceptible to the triclosan-containing agent Aquasept (SSL) than were the MRSA and MSSA strains, with resistance increasing with glycopeptide resistance. Products containing Betadine (Purdue) were more effective against the GISA and hGISA strains than against the MRSA and MSSA strains, especially after the strain was exposed to the product for 30 seconds.Conclusions.: Using the EN 1040 standard criteria for the performance of disinfectants, we determined that all agents, except 50% Aquasept for hGISA and 0.33% hexachlorophene for GISA, performed effectively. However, the GISA and hGISA strains were less susceptible to triclosan-containing products, compared with the MRSA stains, but were more susceptible to products containing Betadine.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frequency of Disinfectant Resistance Genes and Genetic Linkage with β-Lactamase Transposon Tn 552 among Clinical StaphylococciAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Antiseptic susceptibility and distribution of antiseptic-resistance genes in methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusFEMS Microbiology Letters, 1999
- Reduced Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to Cetylpyridinium Chloride and ChlorhexidineChemotherapy, 1996
- Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to biocidesInternational Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 1995
- Some perspectives on preservation and disinfection in the present dayInternational Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 1995
- Characterisation of sin, a potential recombinase-encoding gene from Staphylococcus aureusGene, 1994
- Sensitivity of biofilms to antimicrobial agentsJournal of Applied Bacteriology, 1993
- Structure and evolution of a family of genes encoding antiseptic and disinfectant resistance in Staphylococcus aureusGene, 1991
- Effect of growth-rate on resistance of Gram-negative biofilms to cetrimideJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1990
- Sensitivity of methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains to some antibiotics, antiseptics and disinfectantsJournal of Applied Bacteriology, 1988