Abstract
Let αN be any ordinal ordering of N ≥ 3 alternatives. Select some one alternative and let αN−1 be some ordering of the remaining (N − 1) alternatives where αN−1, need not have any relationship to αn. It is shown for a voting system coming from a large class of weighted summation voting systems that there exist examples of voter profiles such that if the voters vote on N alternatives the aggregated result is αN, but if they vote on (N − 1) alternatives, the aggregated result is αN−1. This result holds even if the voting system changes with the number of alternatives.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: