Abstract
Deinstitutionalization as a public policy promised to be a major departure from previous psychiatric practice. Decrying traditional "medical paradigms" and the custodial "warehousing" of mental patients, policy makers advanced a "bold new approach" for care in the community. Progressive humanitarian reform could go hand in hand with fiscal conservatism. Community Mental Health Centers were to be the heart of a new national effort. But the rhetoric of reform failed to coalesce the activities among competing federal and state interests and systems. Intended beneficiaries may have become unfortunate victims.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: