Can Goals of Care Be Used to Predict Intervention Preferences in an Advance Directive?
- 14 April 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 157 (7) , 801-807
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1997.00440280141014
Abstract
Background: Some have suggested that advance directives elicit goals of care from patients, instead of or in addition to specific intervention preferences, but little is known about whether goals of care can be used in a meaningful way on documents or whether they can predict preferences for specific interventions. Methods: Attending physicians (n=716) at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston were surveyed to elicit general goals of care (eg, treat everything or comfort measures only) along with specific preferences for 11 medical interventions in 6 scenarios. In each scenario, each goal was classified as an adequate predictor of acceptance or rejection of an intervention if its predictive value of the preference for that intervention was at least 80%. Results: Goals varied with scenarios (P<.001) in a predictable manner. The goal treat everything was an adequate predictor of acceptance of each intervention, and comfort was an adequate predictor of rejection for nearly every intervention. Attempt cure adequately predicted acceptance of almost every nonaggressive intervention, but did not predict acceptance of aggressive interventions. Quality of life predicted rejection of aggressive interventions in 3 scenarios, but was not useful in other cases. When goals were predictors of preferences, the mean range of 95% confidence intervals for their predictive values was generally 20% or less. Conclusions: Goals have a valid role in advance directives, since the goal choices had a logical relationship to scenarios and intervention choices. However, the 2 goals attempt cure and choose quality of life were not predictive in many instances. If these findings hold true for more general populations of patients, then advance directive documents will need to rely on more than these general goal statements if they are to adequately represent patient preferences. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:801-807This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disease-specific advance directivesThe Lancet, 1994
- Advance Directives: Can Patients?? Stated Treatment Choices Be Used to Infer Unstated Choices?Medical Care, 1994
- Advance directives. Stability of patients' treatment choicesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1994
- Advance Directives for Medical Care — A Case for Greater UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after CruzanJAMA, 1990
- The Values History: An Innovation in Surrogate Medical Decision-MakingLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1990
- The Medical Directive. A new comprehensive advance care documentPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1989
- A review of the ethical and legal aspects of terminating medical careThe American Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The living will. Help or hindrance?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1983
- X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random samplingJournal of Computers in Education, 1900