Reporting controlled trials
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 96 (4) , 397-400
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb02412.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Problems in the Reporting of Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.BMJ, 1986
- Quality of controlled clinical trials. The case of imaging ultrasound in obstetrics: a reviewBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- When Was a 'Negative' Clinical Trial Big Enough?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1985
- When was a "negative" clinical trial big enough? How many patients you needed depends on what you foundArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1985
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Reporting on Methods in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1980
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978