The Efficacy of Group Versus One-to-One Instruction: A Review
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Remedial and Special Education
- Vol. 7 (1) , 22-30
- https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700106
Abstract
The issue of pup versus one-to-one instruction and training is explored through a review of relevant reseanh in this area. Distinctions between the concept of individualized instruction and one-to-one instruction are presented Discussion of the research focuses on the concerns of effectiveness, eficiency, and social benfits. Implications for educational programming and fiture research are presented.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of One-to-One versus Couplet Instruction with Autistic ChildrenBehavioral Disorders, 1983
- Misguided Mainstreaming: The Case for Social Skills Training with Handicapped ChildrenExceptional Children, 1982
- CORRECTIVE READING PROGRAMME: AN EVALUATIONBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
- INVOLVING INSTITUTIONAL STAFF IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF SIGN LANGUAGE SKILLS WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED PERSONSJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1981
- Facilitating the social mainstreaming of retarded childrenExceptional Education Quarterly, 1981
- Direct InstructionPublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- Teaching Reading and Language to the Disadvantaged— What We Have Learned from Field ResearchHarvard Educational Review, 1977
- TWO‐TO‐ONE versus ONE‐TO‐ONE STUDENT‐TEACHER RATIOS IN THE OPERANT VERBAL TRAINING OF RETARDED CHILDREN1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977
- Establishing Imitative Speech Employing Operant Techniques in a Group SettingJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1973
- Using Behavior Modification Principles to Teach Sight VocabularyTEACHING Exceptional Children, 1970