Ultrasonicversusjet nebulization of iloprost in severe pulmonary hypertension
Open Access
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by European Respiratory Society (ERS) in European Respiratory Journal
- Vol. 17 (1) , 14-19
- https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.01.17100140
Abstract
Inhalation of iloprost, a stable prostacyclin analogue, is a promising perspective in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. In initial clinical studies, a conventional jet nebulizer system was successfully used to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance and pressure, requiring however, up to twelve inhalations of 12–15 min per day. The aim of this study was to investigate if the application of an equal dose of iloprost at a drastically reduced duration of inhalation with the use of a more efficient ultrasonic nebulizer, leads to comparable haemodynamic effects, without escalation of side effects.The physical features of the jet nebulizer system (Ilo-NebTM) and the ultrasonic nebulizer (Multisonic CompactTM) were characterized by laser diffractometry and a Tc99m-tracer technique. Mass median aerodynamic diameters were 3.2 µm for the jet and 3.9 µm for the ultrasonic nebulizer. Total output (mean±sd) was 60±7 µL·min−1(jet) and 163±15 µL·min−1(ultrasonic), and efficiency of the devices was 39±3% (jet) and 86±5% (ultrasonic). Based on these data, a total inhalative dose of 2.8 µg iloprost was delivered by jet nebulization within 12 min and by ultrasonic nebulization within 4 min, in 18 patients with severe primary and secondary pulmonary hypertension (New York Heart Association class III and IV), in a randomized crossover design. Haemodynamics were assessed by right heart catheterization.Inhalation with the ultrasonic device and jet nebulizer, reduced mean±sem pulmonary artery pressure from 54.3±2.1 to 47.1±2.0 and from 53.5±2.2 to 47.0±2.2 mmHg, respectively, and mean±sem pulmonary vascular resistance from 1073±109 to 804±87 and from 1069±125 to 810±83 dyn·s·cm−5, respectively. Both modes of aerosolization were well tolerated.In conclusion, due to the markedly higher efficiency and output of the ultrasonic device, wastage of drug is largely avoided and the duration of inhalation can be shortened to one-third, with comparable haemodynamic effects and without enforcing side effects.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Treatment of Primary Pulmonary Hypertension with Aerosolized Iloprost, a Prostacyclin AnalogueNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Inhaled Prostacyclin and Iloprost in Severe Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary to Lung FibrosisAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1999
- Short-term and long-term epoprostenol (prostacyclin) therapy in pulmonary hypertension secondary to connective tissue diseases: results of a pilot studyEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1999
- A Comparison of Continuous Intravenous Epoprostenol (Prostacyclin) with Conventional Therapy for Primary Pulmonary HypertensionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Respiratory Effects of Occupational Exposure to Aerosolized PentamidineJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1995
- Exposure of Health Care Workers to Aerosolized PentamidineChest, 1992
- Survival in Patients with Primary Pulmonary HypertensionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Treatment of Primary Pulmonary Hypertension with Continuous Intravenous Prostacyclin (Epoprostenol)Annals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- The Place of Prostacyclin in the Clinical Management of Primary Pulmonary HypertensionAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1987
- Experimental determination of the regional deposition of aerosol particles in the human respiratory tractAihaj Journal, 1980